I have read some that the whole wearing of Pajama was forced in practice by Hari Singh Nalwa he forced Afghans to wear pajama like women so that to teach them a lesson of trying to take the virtue of women and from that onwards it caught on as a fashion. If you interact with some who come through diaspora, some can speak pashto but can't speak Urdu. This is something detrimental by actually interacting with some in person.Īs you can see below that is Pakistan, Peshawar and they are speaking Pashto.
Food groups aswell which are more popular in afghanistan also arise in afghanistan, there is that irritating broken urdu spoken by peshawaris aswell. Some even fooled immigration when western countries were handing over asylum. How about people in Peshawar Pakistan still speaking pashtun and some farsi? How about people maintaining an Afghan identity from their ancestry as pathan from the pakhtun region as oppossed to a Jinnah based Pakistani one? Or the basic salwar, kameez and hat fashion with styles more like over the border? Or preference in Afghan borders. The technological factor is quite a huge difference.Īre there any traces of any Afghani culture in present day Pakistan? I do not mean any cross-cultural evolution due to close proximity but anything carried over from some military campaign or conquest etc.? Sikhs comfort level with our women cohabiting with afghan men is probably much lower then Nato's which can be used a mental game probably around Nalwas time aswell. However a culture is shared between those Sikhs and afghans, both may have seen the other as a barbarian back then. Akhmeeeed Durrani/Abdali defined sikhs to be followers of an antichrist according to Sikh history from Persian sources and let's just say mercy for being a demonic army doesn't work as well as followers of Jesus who from koranic evidence may have a glimmer of hope of salvation and might be the good guys it's not as clear cut as it is for demonic anti christ men. The dhimmi rules are different for Christians as they are for polytheists or dare said followers of an anti christ. Edited Apby JatherdarSahibĭifficult to compare NATO to Nalwa, different time, different technology, different conflict with a similar denominator of taking over the world under the army of Muhammad. The technological factor is quite a huge difference. So the difference we find is Sikander/Alexandera invaded for "profit" and Nalwa invaded for survival to avoid further attacks coming in from Afghanistan.ĭifficult to compare NATO to Nalwa, different time, different technology, different conflict with a similar denominator of taking over the world under the army of Muhammad. Hari Singh Nalwa said we haven't conquered (taken) anyones home, we have only protected our own home(s)"
0 kommentar(er)
